Why natural and lab-grown diamonds are now graded differently

The diamond world is entering a new era. 

In a landmark move, the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) announced that by the end of 2025, it will no longer evaluate lab-grown diamonds (LGD) using the iconic 4Cs: cut, color, clarity, and carat that have defined diamond grading for decades. 

Instead, lab-grown stones will be categorized more broadly as ‘premium’ or ‘standard,’ and some, frankly, won’t be graded at all.

But this isn’t just a story about gemology. It’s about identity, origin, and the changing ways we assign meaning to what we wear. Because while natural and lab-grown diamonds may look the same, they couldn’t be telling more different stories.

READ: Filipina French winemaker Florence Duchêne is giving Champagne a fresh face

Differentiating natural and lab-grown diamonds

At the core of this shift is a deeper appreciation for origin. Natural diamonds are geological marvels, forged deep within the Earth’s mantle over billions of years through heat, pressure, and chance. Each stone is singular, bearing tiny imperfections that hint at its ancient, geological past.

Lab-grown diamonds, on the other hand, are the result of human innovation. Created using sophisticated technologies, they are formed in controlled laboratory environments that simulate the conditions of natural diamond formation. Visually and chemically, they are nearly indistinguishable from natural diamonds.

diamonds
From left: Asscher-cut and cushion-cut natural diamonds; clarity for natural diamonds | Photos from A Diamond is Forever, courtesy of Media OutReach Newswire

A natural diamond, like an antique Asscher-cut passed down through generations, carries the weight of history. Lab-grown diamonds, on the other hand, are futuristic by design: think sleek, high-clarity stones from brands like VRAI, often purchased not to uphold tradition but to redefine it.

Why a new grading system matters

The truth is, most lab-grown gems today are incredibly consistent. Too consistent, in fact, for the 4Cs to be useful anymore. According to the GIA, more than 95 percent of these stones fall into a narrow range of quality. In short, grading them the same way we grade natural diamonds doesn’t offer any real insight. It just blurs the line between two very different worlds.

Imagine trying to judge a couture gown and a made-to-measure suit using the same checklist. They may both be beautiful, but they’re built for different occasions, and their worth lies in different details.

From left: Natural diamond rough, High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) LGD diamond, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) LGD diamond | Photos from A Diamond is Forever, courtesy of Media OutReach Newswire

So GIA’s decision isn’t about one being better than the other. It’s about giving each its own space to be understood. A natural diamond might be chosen for its rarity. Say, a warm-toned oval from Botswana with feather-like inclusions, imperfect but irreplaceable. Conversely, a lab-grown stone might appeal to someone drawn to its purity and modern edge—perfectly cut, pristinely white, and often half the price.

In response to changing consumer priorities

What we’re really seeing here is a shift in values. Buyers aren’t just choosing sparkle, they’re choosing stories. Some want romance, symbolism, and a sense of geological wonder. Others want transparency, intention, and the freedom to design their own meaning.

Take the woman who buys herself a lab-grown emerald cut ‘just because’ or the couple who chooses a salt-and-pepper diamond for its moody, stormy beauty. Neither are guided by convention. Both are guided by emotion.

And then there’s the question of sustainability. While lab-grown diamonds don’t require mining, they still use energy, some of it renewable, much of it not. Meanwhile, several natural diamond producers, particularly in Canada and southern Africa, are doubling down on ethical sourcing and reinvesting in the communities around their mines. The conversation isn’t clear-cut but perhaps that’s the point. Today’s luxury is defined not by absolutes but by awareness.

GIA’s move isn’t drawing a line; it’s opening up the conversation. It’s a quiet acknowledgment that a diamond doesn’t need to follow old rules to be meaningful. It doesn’t have to be flawless, traditional, or even mined. It simply has to reflect you.

Today, clarity isn’t just about how light passes through a stone—it’s about intention. And beauty? It no longer fits into a single definition. It speaks in stories, in choices, in the quiet confidence of something that feels right.

Read more...
OSZAR »